Track your brand across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini & Grok.

Benchmark the same prompt set, side by side

Compare your citation rate against up to 3 competitors on the identical prompt set, by engine and by prompt. See which rivals are winning the mentions you're not, which source domains drive their citations, and how the gap trends week over week.

The domains behind their citations

See the Reddit threads, G2 profiles, docs, and PR placements that AI engines quote for your competitors — the exact third-party surfaces to go earn.

Detect the gap, write to fill it

Citation patterns flow into the AI Content Editor as scoring criteria. Spot a query a rival owns, brief content to close it, score the draft, publish, re-track.

Not just present — how prominent

Being mentioned third in a list is not the same as being the headline recommendation. SearchChamp scores position-in-answer so you optimize for prominence, not just presence.

How the answer frames you

Track whether engines describe your brand positively, neutrally, or with caveats — and watch sentiment shift as your content and reputation work lands.

Know which AI crawlers actually visited

Most tools guess from a user-agent string — trivial to spoof. SearchChamp verifies every AI crawler against the vendor's published IP ranges, so "Verified" means a confirmed GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot, not a spoofer. We score 5 crawlers for GEO readiness: Googlebot, GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and GeminiBot. Every visit is classified verified, spoof, or unverifiable — and we never store raw IPs.

• Every visit classified verified, spoof, or unverifiable
• Classified on IP/ASN — raw IPs are never stored
• Verified means IP/ASN-confirmed — never a user-agent guess

Turn cited domains into a to-do list

SearchChamp logs every source an engine cites — your pages, your competitors', and the third-party sites driving their mentions. Then it turns the pattern into specific moves: claim a G2 profile, answer the Reddit thread, place a piece of digital PR on the domain the engine already trusts.

• Per-engine, per-prompt source-domain attribution
• Linked vs. unlinked mention tracking
• Concrete next steps — earn the source, don't just observe it

We measure outcomes — we don't sell guarantees

robots.txt is advisory, not enforcement, and no on-page signal guarantees a citation. SearchChamp never promises ranking lift from llms.txt, schema, or a "block AI" toggle. We track what AI answers actually do — verified crawler visits and real citation outcomes — so your reporting stays defensible.

See your AI visibility through each buyer's eyes

Define the personas your buyers fall into — proposed automatically from your site or added by hand — and SearchChamp breaks your AI-answer visibility down per persona. A persona-by-engine coverage matrix shows exactly where a segment can't find you, and per-persona near-miss opportunities point at the prompts you're one move away from winning.

• AI-proposed or hand-built buyer personas
• A persona-by-engine coverage matrix
• Per-persona near-miss opportunities to prioritise

Give AI crawlers a clean rendition of each page — and measure what changes

AI crawlers parse your rendered pages, navigation and cookie banners included. SearchChamp turns every page from your latest crawl into a clean markdown rendition — same facts, better structure — and checks each one against its own source page with an automated equivalence review before it can be served. A rendition that adds or contradicts a claim is rejected and never published. We make no claim that this changes how often engines cite you: the before/after panel reports your own citation and accuracy rates on each side of activation, including when nothing moved.

• Serve as an agent bundle on our CDN, linked from your own robots.txt or llms.txt
• Or opt into an edge snippet that answers mapped AI crawlers on your own URLs
• Renditions carry noindex and a canonical pointer back to the original page

See who's sponsoring the AI answers your buyers are reading

AI engines have started selling placements inside the answer itself. SearchChamp reports paid placements appearing alongside your tracked prompts, who bought them, and where a competitor sponsors a prompt you already rank on organically — observation only, we never buy ads, bid, or estimate a bid. Coverage is honest, not uniform, and that honesty is the point of the feature rather than a caveat on it. Runs on answers your AI Visibility tracker already collected — no extra probes, no extra cost.

• Google's AI surfaces and Copilot label paid items in the data itself — those reads are structured and high-confidence
• ChatGPT and Perplexity return prose only, so a nightly pass looks for disclosure language and marks anything uncertain "possibly sponsored" rather than asserting an ad
• Claude, Gemini and Grok expose nothing at all about paid placements — SearchChamp says so plainly instead of showing a reassuring zero

Weight each prompt by the reach it really carries

Every tracked prompt carries an estimated monthly search volume, modelled from keyword data, so you can prioritise the questions that actually move traffic — and SearchChamp rolls them into a single "reclaimable reach" figure for the answers you're missing. When there is no volume data for a prompt, it says so honestly instead of inventing a number.

• Estimated monthly volume on every tracked prompt
• A "reclaimable reach" roll-up across the answers you are missing
• An honest "unknown" when no volume data exists — never a fabricated figure

Measure the answers your market actually gets

An AI answer in Riyadh is not the answer in Chicago. You pick a target market — country and language — when you connect a site, and change it whenever you like. Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT and Gemini are then measured in that market rather than against a fixed United States default. Claude, Perplexity and Grok expose no location setting, so they are queried without one — and we don't dress that up: every answer measured in a market records which one, and a run that could not resolve yours is labelled as measured against the United States rather than quietly filed as local.

• Target market — country and language — set when you connect a site, changeable at any time
• Every answer measured in a market records which market, and says so when it fell back to the United States
• Answer language is set per prompt; tracking one prompt across more than one market is on Business and above